« DimWittery Alert: Al Gore Comes Unglued, The Sequel | Main | In A Rare Moment Of Honesty... »

February 13, 2006

She's Baaaaaack....

That's right, one of the half-vast editorial staff's fave Ditzy Chicks has returned with yet another suburban tale of Gender Oppression perpetrated by the Penile Hegemony. Last year, the courageous Judith Warner broke ranks with the hypnotized throngs of Stepford Wives to reveal America's shameful secret: Mommyhood is Hell. Children are selfish little parasites whose sole purpose in life is to suck all the joy from their unwilling mothers' lives.

This year she reports from the soulless urban ghetto known as Northwest DC's Cleveland Park. Just listening to a day in the horrific life of these domestic slaves is enough to give properly-educated American women the shivers:

Who routinely unloads the dishwasher, puts away the laundry and picks up the socks in your house? Who earns the largest share of the money? Who calls the shots?

"The answer, for a great many families, is the same as it was 50 years ago.

"The fact is, no matter how time- or sleep-deprived they are, working women today do upwards of 70 percent of household chores for their families. The gender caste system is still alive and well in most of our households. After all, no one really wants to do the scrubbing and folding and chauffeuring and mopping and shopping and dry-cleaner runs. (I’m leaving child-minding out of this; in a happily balanced life, it doesn’t feel like a chore.) Once the money for outsourcing runs dry, it’s the lower-status member of the household who does these things. It is the lower-status member of the household who is called a ’nag’ when she repeatedly tries to get other members of the household to share in doing them."

All of this sounds perfectly awful... until you consider the opening paragraphs of Ms. Warner's little (wo)manifesto:

And yet, five years ago, as I settled, for the first time, into a life where I worked minimal hours, spent maximal time with my children and was almost entirely dependent on my husband's salary and health benefits, ancient history became a current affair. I lived surrounded by women whose lives were much like mine, and the sentences that swirled around me on the playground stirred memories of thoughts and phrases I'd read long before.

The voices coalesced into a chorus of discontent that haunted me until one evening, after my daughters had gone to sleep, I went through a pile of boxes and dug up my old copy of Ms. Friedan's book. This time, as it had for many of the homemakers who read it when it was published in 1963, "The Feminine Mystique" felt horribly familiar. Looking back convinced me that we needed to start working toward a different future.

In other words, this woman is outraged someone expects her to compensate for working fewer hours than her husband by actually contributing something toward the running of the household. Mein Gott im Himmel! The barbarism of men is beyond belief, is it not? She should be lying betwixt satin sheets and eating bon-bons with all that extra time! But no! Instead she is locked into a hellish existence where she has nothing better to do than fulminate about a book she read over a quarter of a century ago!

Would that her husband had so much free time, the big bully. Ms. Warner laments the fact that women, whom feminists like Nancy Hopkins forbid to even suggest are not equal to men in every way, are still helpless victims of the fascist patriarchal hegemony:

Thirty-six years later, with women having flooded the professions and explicit gender discrimination outlawed, the institutions of our society simply have not changed to embrace and accommodate the new realities of women's lives.

The problems of home life seem to me now to be an all but hopeless conundrum.

Ah yes... even when women are free to choose what they will make of their lives, things are still completely hopeless. Though Ms. Warner has chosen to work "minimum hours" and spend "maximum time" with her children, somehow she is the victim. It is not she, but "institutions" who must figure out how to change the inescapable fact that someone really does need to be at home to do the laundry, wash the dishes, and care for the children. Either Ms. Judy can do these things or she can go to work and offer up a part of her salary (and that of her husband) to a paid employee who will be more than happy to do these things for her.

But then she would miss the experience of watching her children grow up, wouldn't she? And no doubt in that case, we could expect yet another Postcard From Over The Edge, lamenting how the Fascist Oppressors have bereft her of the chance to bond with those precious little tykes she looooongs for while chained to her desk in some sterile office in downtown DC - by her male boss, of course.

Stay tuned, folks. The saga continues....

Posted by Cassandra at February 13, 2006 12:01 PM

Comments

This piece amused me, too. "Who unloads the dishwasher?" indeed. The answer is that every family sorts out its own division of labor, according to the desires of the immediate participants. It's no one's business who unloads the dishwasher, excepting those people in that particular household.

As it happens, in my household, I do the dishes -- my wife hates dishwashing worse than any other chore. And I don't even have a dishwasher -- I do every dish by hand, using hot water, soap, bleach, and a scouring pad. You don't hear me griping about it; I could buy a dishwasher if I wanted one, or I could hire someone to do it (maybe -- that's harder out on the edge of the Wild than it is in Cleveland Park). Or, I could offer to pick up some other set of chores such as would balance out for my wife having to do the dishes.

As it is, I choose to do the dishes; and in turn, she does a number of things I don't like to do. I imagine our authoress has a number of benefits in return for the horrid chore of 'unloading the dishwasher,' which she doesn't choose to explain to us because it would undermine her argument-from-oppression.

It reminds me of that piece from last autumn, in which the authoress was arguing in favor of divorce and against marriage on the grounds that -- if you were living a comfortable life -- the question of who picked up the dry cleaning would become the most important thing in your life. If your husband wouldn't do it, why should you live with him?

Good gracious.

Posted by: Grim [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 12:24 PM

Well, when I stayed at home FT, my husband really did not do much of anything around the house.

But on the other hand, you didn't see me going in to his office and typing away on his computer or going to the field in zero degree weather either! I took care of the home front and he brought home the bacon. If I wanted extra money I went out and earned it but that was my decision, not something he ever asked me to do.

As a matter of fact he would have preferred I not do it. But I didn't ask him and he didn't tell me what to do, just as I don't try to tell him how to spend his work day -- that's his business :)

I trust him to take care of his responsibilities unless and until he gives me reason not to. He has always extended me the same courtesy.

People are so spoiled. No wonder everyone is getting divorced these days.

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 12:51 PM

AHquitcherbichin.Don't we buy you gals flowers every February 14th? Whaaya what. Blood?

Posted by: spd rdr [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 01:27 PM

Oh my, a chance to rant . . . .

This silly little bag had better be skilled in some of the more esoteric erotic arts, because she ain't be gwan' to have no man for long, unless he's a perfectly emasculated squirrel.

I may not have been the best husband at all times, but I always did my share of the household chores, including diaper changes, baths and whatnot. I worked hard to get to the point where I could support our family on my salary so she could be home full-time, which is what she wanted to do.

I gave her the freedom and support to get a part-time job later, on her own terms, and then to begin learning a skill that she had always wanted to master.

Then the bitch left me.

Posted by: Chris Hunt [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 04:52 PM

Well, congratulations, Chris!
Sometimes the bitch never leaves.

Posted by: spd rdr [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 05:35 PM

My goodness... did someone sit in you guys' cornflakes this morning?

Chris, I am sorry. Divorce is really tough. I hope you find someone who appreciates you someday :)

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 05:43 PM

Or, like a boomerang, she just comes back. (!)

Here, pass me that sandwich.

Heigh-ho, neighbor!

Posted by: Don Brouhaha [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 09:16 PM

It's Cap'n Crunch, and no one sat in it that I saw. Maybe the cat, but I was watching very closely.

I just get tired of people complaining about their horrid lives when they haven't got a clue how good they have it. It's the ingratitude that gets my goat.

Imagine a whiney liberal like that as a single parent. Thank God my kids have a troglodyte like me.

Posted by: Chris Hunt [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 09:44 PM

It could be worse, she could be her child. That must suck.

Posted by: Pile On [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 13, 2006 09:58 PM

Cat sat in your Cap'n Crunch?

I will have to have a talk with that woman - she is getting out of control... heh.

Pile, I imagine her kids are quite spoiled. That's what tends to go with this whiny sort of nonsense: an inability to set limits. That happens to be my pet peeve about women in general.

We have a tendency, because we genuinely love our husbands and children, to want to give and give and give until there is nothing left. We would do anything to make them happy, so sometimes we forget to draw the line firmly between the "needs" of others and our own needs. The result, if we're not honest with ourselves, is resentment.

Other people can suck you dry if you let them and there is a fine line between giving freely and giving with an expectation (whether conscious or unconscious) of reciprocal treatment, which in the case of husbands and children is a BIG mistake. I find that a lot of women make themselves "indispensible" to their loved ones, doing all sorts of things for them that they are perfectly capable of doing for themselves, then sit and stew because NOTHING their loved ones can ever do will equal that amount of devotion and they find their families rightly chafing under the load of yet another guilt trip.

Men often act purposely obtuse when they notice this but secretly feel bad, which only whacks their wives off b/c they think the big lug didn't notice (he did, but he ain't about to let on).

Kind of like the Cycle of Violence, but much worse :)

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 08:23 AM

And Don, you're a punk.

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 08:27 AM

The Penile Hegemony. Does this mean they stand united?

Posted by: Crckt [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 09:04 AM

Proudly, ramrod straight.

Err... I'm findin myself oddly turned on by that last comment. I need to go now.

*ducking out for a cold shower*

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 09:09 AM

(I’m leaving child-minding out of this; in a happily balanced life, it doesn’t feel like a chore.)

And there the harridan has killed her argument.

I have a happily balanced life. I do those dreadful chores and work to teach the children we have the meaning of 'responsibility.' If I don't, who will?
The government nannies she seeks for all working women? The domestic help that has to be hired?
I think not.

Yesterday, we had a major event to deal with and thanks to spd, I still had that vision in brain.
Anyhoo, we went from that to being parents. Yes, the kitchen looked as if grated cheese gesploded all over the floor.

The brownies that I had baked earlier that morning
in my then sparkling kitchen were lurking in the microwave, and used as bribes.

The kitchen was cleaned, the living room cleared of toys, vacuumed and dusted. Food was prepared and we sat down with our offspring (aka Child Labor Units) to discuss their day.

Later on, bedrooms were tidied, clothes sorted for the laundry next day, the familiar and much welcomed routine of bedtime was the focus. It was prayers, devotions and bedtime stories for the two youngest.

I would not trade that for anything. I have real power here. Not the power of the world, but the real power of love and respect.

Posted by: Crckt [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 09:13 AM

The hand that rocks the cradle, rules the world :)

Seriously, there is much to be said for just being there at the end of the day when your husband is tired. Something I all too often forget when my own work day has been long and hectic.

Last night he got home very late and I could tell he was just drained. I don't normally do this, but I took a moment to turn down the bed, fluff up his pillow and the down comforter, set his book on the cover and turn the lamp on so all would be ready for him when he finally climbed under the covers. It wasn't much.

This morning when I got up at 4 am, on my keyboard was a Valentine's day card. Where on earth did he find the time? He's been so busy lately.

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 09:22 AM

He found the time because he wanted to. Love is a verb and both partners act on it. It is knowing the little things that mean something to your partner and taking the time to do them...remind them that we care and want to show it.

Posted by: Crckt [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 14, 2006 09:41 AM

I took a moment to turn down the bed, fluff up his pillow and the down comforter, set his book on the cover and turn the lamp on so all would be ready for him when he finally climbed under the covers.

THAT is what I call a good marriage--when you do the little things for each other because you're thinking of each other, trying to make the other's day just a little sweeter. That kind of thing I never, EVER saw, not even once--not even close--with my ex. I know the resentment you talk about, and it comes not from someone never ever ever just stepping in to handle the dishes; it's because it would never even occur to someone (like my ex) to do anything of the kind. I think I would have dropped dead from shock if my ex had ever done anything like you described. I must have been drunk when I married the son of a bitch.

Posted by: Beth [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 21, 2006 08:28 AM

You know, I've always felt really lucky Beth (and I think considering how young I got married, I know I truly *was* lucky). Like most couples, we've had our struggles, but I've always known he was trying and he's always known I was trying so we've managed to work a few things out over 27 years.

But I've also been shocked at how easily we can hurt each other, even with all that going for us. I can only begin to imagine how awful it would be to be in a destructive relationship, and that's bad enough. I hope you find someone who makes you really happy :) They do exist.

Posted by: Cassandra [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 21, 2006 08:46 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)