« Military Wives | Main | NY TimesWatch: NewsFlash! Criminals Predisosed To Commit Crimes! »
March 13, 2007
Where Are The Adults?
Fbl sent me this, this morning:
This is a departure in content for these parts, but I had to share...
Prosecutors said Lackey is expectant father of six children with six different women. The women all are expected to deliver between August and October.That a man had sex with six different women in three months is between him and the women. But the six babies that are resulting from it...
I'm almost beyond words. Six children who are obviously going to grow up without their father--you think a man who does this is going to be conscientious about making sure he's involved in their lives and is paying the proper child support? I almost wish the six other women didn't know about each other so they could suddenly find out and take their vengeance on him. What an unspeakably irresponsible and selfish man!
And the story reminds me of the questions I've been asked by my new colleagues recently. We were discussing children one day and I was suddenly asked, "Don't you want to have children?" As if I had expressed a desire not to (I hadn't said a word about it, but they knew I had a boyfriend at the time).
When I hesitated, she continued, "Don't you want your boyfriend to give you a baby?"
I struggled with how to answer her without getting into personal discussions I didn't want to have. So I finally said, "My boyfriend and I are not long-term."
Her reply: "So? Wouldn't you like him to give you a baby?"
The rest of the group affirmed their similar thoughts and I about fell over. I finally gathered myself together and told her that I didn't want to bring a baby into the world when she more than likely wouldn't have a father involved in her life on a daily basis. I suffered because my father died when I was young, but why set someone up for that on purpose? I told her it seemed incredibly irresponsible and unbelievably selfish, and besides that I didn't make enough money to support a baby.
She was married and childless, and she (and the rest of the women) looked at me like I had two heads. I'm not so sheltered and naive that I don't know that purposely-single mothers are looked upon with tolerance or acceptance, but this level of positive talk about it just blew me away.
Well, she's not the only one.
How did we get to the point where we wink at this kind of selfishness?
Because that's exactly what it is: a complete role reversal. In place of a nurturing parent/child relationship (with a strong mother and father providing physical and emotional support for a dependant child) we now have an utterly ridiculous situation.
In place of a warm, nurturing mother we have a needy, self-centered girl who looks to her child to fill a void in her life. This strong, independent New Age Womyn asks not what she can do for her child, but what her child can do for her. And instead of a strong father figure supporting and defending the family, we have somehow come to the absurd position where we paradoxically maintain the father's physical and emotional presence is completely unnecessary but his financial contribution is absolutely essential to the child's well-being; so much so that society evidently feels no compunction about compelling it even when it turns out that "Dad" isn't really the father at all.
Why do we condone ridiculous reproductive "choices" like this for women, but not for men? Why can women deliberately conceive, bear (or not bear), and raise children outside of wedlock regardless of the wishes of the fathers involved? We do it, we say, because we are concerned for the best interest of the child, as though a paycheck somehow served to satisfy the child's interest. But at some point might it make sense to ask whether we are indirectly subsidizing one-parent families; encouraging less responsible courses of action?
The evidence that daily life - and parents - are becoming more self absorbed and less family oriented is all around us:
IT'S One o'clock on a recent Saturday. Inside The Knitting Factory, a well-known local nightclub, loud music pulsates through a crowd of dancers, inviting them to "leave the nine to five up on the shelf, and just enjoy yourself." The mirror ball overhead sends light sparkles through the dimly lit room, illuminating the occasional beer bottle or cocktail in a partyer's hand.Occasionally, though, it also lights up another kind of bottle, the kind that babies use, because this is not a late-night party. This 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. bash coincides with most children's afternoon naptime.
The event is a midday soiree specifically for the Mommy-and-me set – a nationwide phenomenon known as Baby Loves Disco. One afternoon each month, local organizers take over a nightclub – complete with a cash bar and the regular DJ spinning his normal playlist – and throw open the doors to anyone under the age of 7, accompanied by parents.
The two-year-old concept, now in 16 cities, has clearly struck a national nerve. It sells out every time it expands into a new city, just as it did this past month in Boston. But as Baby Loves Disco has outgrown its humble origins in Philadelphia, acquiring sponsors and partners along the way, the concept of combining babies and clubbing is coming under sharper scrutiny. Some child advocates call it downright dangerous while other cultural observers call it the latest sign of an ongoing fundamental shift in our attitudes toward children.
"One of the major premises revealed in [Baby Loves Disco] is that we've shifted from a child-friendly to an adult-driven lifestyle," says Lynne Griffin, an author and registered nurse who teaches in the Family Studies graduate program at Boston's Wheelock College. "What we're seeing increasingly is adults sharing a lifestyle with their children that is geared towards adult needs for everything from sleep to daily activities such as entertainment and communication."
Noting that parenting styles tend to go in cycles, many clinical experts dub this a period of permissive parenting, in which adults do not set appropriate boundaries between themselves and their offspring.
"I'm seeing parents who look at their children and say, 'He's just like me, so whatever is good for me is good for him,' " says Don MacMannis, a child psychologist who is codirector of The Family Therapy Institute of Santa Barbara, Calif.
These are adults who have never grown up. From taking their kids to nightclubs and bars to dressing their toddlers like Britney Spears, they are almost willfully blind to the dangers of what they are doing;

I was listening to talk radio (I think it was Laura Ingraham) and another listener called to complain about the lack of modest swim-wear available at the beach “swim-wear” shops for her five-year-old. She claims to have found not one, but “several styles and colors of thong bikini swimsuits” sized to fit her toddler at the boutique! As a parent, what does dressing your five year old in a thong bikini say to a pedophile? Or for that matter, what does it say about your fitness as a parent? Sure, the example of a toddler-sized thong bikini from a beach-side boutique may be extreme, but how many parents do you suppose would give a second-thought to dressing their daughters like this or this* to go to the hotel swimming pool - and believe it is perfectly sensible because it comes from a reputable, upscale store like Nordstrom?
Amazingly, too many adult Americans have become so self absorbed that they forget children both deserve and need the protection of adults; and in a world where children spend a good portion of each day at school or in the company of friends, day care providers, or other members of the community their parents cannot always protect them from the outside world. Yet proposals to limit things that have become prevalent in our culture only as recently as ten or fifteen years ago, to protect children, are invariably greeted with cries of horror. Even parents, it seems, don't want to be inconvenienced by their own offspring.
Carol Liebau comments:
Increasingly, one reads stories like these that suggest that children have become the new equivalent of the tiny dogs starlets are wont to carry around in their purses -- seen as the season’s cute and cuddly must-have accessory, but justifying no restrictions whatsoever on the grown-ups’ desires or way of life.
Given that children don't have credit cards, one has to wonder: just who is in charge here? Where have all the adults gone?
Posted by Cassandra at March 13, 2007 08:18 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.villainouscompany.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1355
Comments
"Baby Loves Disco."
I bet baby does. Indeed, as I reflect on disco music, I think it may be only babies who really have any right to love it.
There must be a middle ground here, though. I agree that FbL's colleagues were... er, awful. Plainly, the sort of person who brings children into the world expecting the rest of society to pay for them is not blessed with brains or morals.
Yet, there is something to be said for a world that is "adult centric" rather than "child centric." I think it is good for children to encounter and start thinking about the adult world early and often.
I'm not sure discos are a part of the "adult world," but let's leave that.
A child needs space for fantasy and safety, but so does a man (or a woman). A man needs time for faith and the power of story, and so does a child.
There are some mysteries that should wait, and indeed must wait -- I remember having seen some racy movies as a kid, and just wishing they'd get back to the interesting parts. It's not all that easy to corrupt children, who really are innocent in a perfect sense of the word.
We have to protect the children, but not too much. Killing pedophiles, that I can assent to doing. Trying to remake their parents' world to reflect juvenile interests, though, is too much. It's good for them to encounter the adult world, a little bit at a time.
Posted by: Grim at March 13, 2007 11:00 PM
But what do you do when 6th graders are having sex, in class?? Something went very wrong, in more places than one (first, the parenting, second, that the teacher could not see ever inch of the classroom just by looking around).
When I was little, I always thought I would get married out of high school and have a family. As I got older, dreams changed and I went to college. Now, I'm in my mid-30s, never married, but I still want to have children. But, I would never purposely bring a child into the world without providing that child with a stable home with two loving parents. I know sometimes circumstances can catch up with you (e.g. - the death of a spouse, making one a single parent).
None of my siblings have kids. None of us are married (although the oldest of my sisters has been dating the same guy for almost 3 years, and although not "engaged", we know it is going to happen eventually). I do have cousins who have kids, most of which are here in the same town as I am.
The oldest of my cousins (R.A.) is about 2 years my junior. He and his wife (M) have a 14-month-old (J), and just found out there is another on the way, come November. Their marriage also managed to survive a still-born, practically full-term child. Erich would be about 6 now. They were married first, and they are financial stable (as far as I can tell).
Now, my cousin's youngest brother (R.E.), on the other hand, got his 17 year old girlfriend (C) pregnant. I'm not sure of the age of consent in Texas, but I'm guessing he's lucky her family didn't press charges (let's just say he's a bit older than she is). Their little girl (A) will be 2 come June. They just had a new baby around the holidays. This second pregnancy was on purpose. My aunt passed away New Year's Day morning. Now, the oldest son has learned that his youngest brother and his wife were financially dependent on their mother, and they got pregnant again anyway. Now, who knows what is going to happen. Anyway, M told me that C told her she should take J to the dentist. M was thinking "I can't afford that, and for teeth he's going to lose anyway", but C takes A to the dentist and it gets covered by some sort of entitlement, which means I, and everyone here in Texas, or possibly the US, is helping to pay for my cousin and his wife to take their little girl to the dentist, when my other cousin and his wife, who own a nice home and pay their own way, can't afford to take their son.
As for the bathing suits, you can still find modest swimwear for little girls. I picked up a part-time job at a Carter's retail store (you know - they are the ones who make clothes for babies and children). They have a fairly wide selection of little girls swimsuits that would cover everything. I have no idea what would possess someone to think that putting a little girl in a thong is a good idea....
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at March 13, 2007 11:36 PM
I think that's a wise idea, Grim. I saw some of that over-dose of child-centric view when I was teaching. I think it left children far too immature in some ways.
You know, it almost seems like we've got it flipped--in areas in which children should remain innocent for longer (sex, adult realities of life in the big, bad world, etc.), they are often forced too "grow up" too soon; but in areas in which they should grow up sooner than most seem to be doing (recognizing the difference between the child world and adult world and respecting it, learning manners and self-control, losing a bit of the childhood egocentricity, etc), they are being allowed to maintain levels of immaturity far longer than appropriate.
And come to think of it, that creates exactly the kind of woman I've been cursed to work with recently...
Posted by: FbL at March 13, 2007 11:36 PM
Today, I took the wee one (no longer particularly small, the wee one) on a hike on Sawnee mountain. They've laid trails on her, now -- when I was a boy, you had to find your own way to the old mines, and the Indian Seats that the Cherokee carved to overlook their domain.
Not long after we arrived at the top, a young lady turned up with two kids. The girl was carrying a sack of Cheetos. Her name was Sophia, which I learned because the adult kept having to call her back from the precipice.
They left the Indian seats before us, and on our way down, I discovered the Cheetos sack laying there on the trail. I picked it up, and told the boy we'd track them down.
Sure enough, we kept a much better pace than them, and eventually came on them resting on the trail.
I tipped my hat to the lady, and offered her the Cheetos sack. "My son thought," I said, "that you might have lost this on the trail."
The lady looked around accusingly at the children. "Who dropped this?" she demanded.
"Was it you, Sophia?" I asked, looking at the little girl.
The girl looked back at me with wide eyes. "How do you know my name?" she wondered.
"I heard the lady say it," I answered. The lady in question announced that she was their aunt.
I nodded to her, and then looked at the girl. "Sophia means 'wisdom' in the Ancient Greek," I told her. "A wise girl should know not to litter in a nature preserve."
With that, the boy and I proceeded past them and down the mountain.
That is what I mean about introducing them to the world of adults. Every part of that accorded with the laws of courtesy and gentlemanly behavior, yet a correction was given. Both the girl and my boy are better for having been party to it.
Posted by: Grim at March 13, 2007 11:48 PM
You know, I have a void in my life.
I'm getting a cat.
Posted by: Sailorette/Foxfier at March 13, 2007 11:48 PM
Yes, Grim. Exactly!
And I just read the whole article about the Disco. Yikes! I thought it was just a place where they kid would have a naptime/daycare environment while the parents partied. But the kids are right in the middle of it. Weird!
Posted by: FbL at March 13, 2007 11:52 PM
Grim, that's classy.
I do notice a lot of...well... folks equating physical maturity with mental and social maturity.
I was a very mature child. It annoyed EVERYONE, I assure you. But I still can't get into oogling models, I still have no desire to dress in thongs (that might be weight related) and the only man I've felt physical desire for is the one I'm engaged to.
This, apparently, makes me "weird" or even a sexually-repressed freak.
Not to be too self-laudatory, but I think the world might be better if more folks were raised so they ended up kinda like me....
Oh, and those sick kiddies clothes? I'd actually be pleased to see a store that sells 5-year-olds pants with "sexy" across the butt sued for encouraging pedophiles.
Posted by: Sailorette/Foxfier at March 13, 2007 11:53 PM
Grim, I have to praise you for your story.
During my childhood, I met several adults who took an interest in my life that way. While I did not always learn the direct lesson, I did learn that there were adults who cared that I mature. (That maturity thing is still a work in progress...oh, never mind.)
And as far as protecting children, I have to agree with your first set of comments.
Posted by: karrde at March 14, 2007 12:06 AM
On Sunday I saw a pair of little girls out for a meal with their family at a restaurant I frequent; neither could've been older than 10 (if that old), yet they both had heavy eye makeup on, such as you might see in a glamour magazine.
It made me think about what happened to little Jonbenet (sp?) Ramsey...
Posted by: camojack at March 14, 2007 03:43 AM
Grim: This reminds me of a similar incident. I was at a bootfair, and saw a group of mother and two children. All of them were black - im not saying that because im racist, it is relivent to the story.
The family bought some food - I cant remember specifics, but some type of icecream or similar - and both children droped their wrappers on the ground - dispite the convenient bin situated about three steps away.
I picked up these wrappers, handed them to the children, pointed to the bin, and said something to all three of them about not littering. I cant remember my words, but they were neither particually polite nor impolite.
At which point the mother went crazy, and started shouting loudly at me, accusing me of racism. 'Is it cos I is black! Are you saying black women can't raise their children!'
We call people like that Izzits - people of a minority group who use their status as PC-protected for personal advantage.
Posted by: Suricou Raven at March 14, 2007 06:22 AM
Rules of our house WRT our 13 year old daughter:
- no exposed midriff
- no words across the butt (for the life of me, I can't understand why parents want eyes drawn to their daughters backside)
- no phone calls from anyone we don't know
- IM blocked to all but school mates
She's still young enough that these limitations don't bother her all that much, but that will surely change in the next year or so.
As it is, she's so full of hormones that we could tap her like a maple tree and set up a nice estrogen donor program.
Posted by: daveg at March 14, 2007 08:38 AM
As it is, she's so full of hormones that we could tap her like a maple tree and set up a nice estrogen donor program.
ROFLMAO! Best definition of a teenage girl I've ever heard. :)
I used to teach a class comprised of nothing but 12 to 14-year-old boys. I always said there was so much testosterone floating in the air I had to take a shower afterwards for fear I'd absorb it through my skin.
Posted by: FbL at March 14, 2007 08:40 AM
This is somewhat off the original topic, Raven, but I'm not sure it really does work to their advantage. Another story: When I was in a Master's program, one of the other candidates was a young black lady. It was fairly obvious that she had managed to get through High School and into college, and then get through college and into graduate school, without having learned the basics of proper English. This was true both in speech and writing.
We had a class where we all read and then commented on each others' papers, and then the professor would offer her critique. She would present these papers that were often incomprehensible, or that could be comprehended only with great difficulty. No one ever said anything about it.
I wondered about it at the time, and still wonder about it. I know why nobody commented on it: the problem you cite above, amplified by the fact that colleges now have structures set up to enforce such complaints. Had she taken offense to the criticism and labeled it racist, a student might be expelled; an untenured professor might be fired, or at least lose any hope of becoming tenured.
In an atmosphere of trust, you might have offered a critique. But there is no such trust. She made occasional references to historical figures as being "racist" (which the figures in question probably were, of course). That was enough to keep an edge in the air: here was a woman who was ready to use the term, and had access to those institutions.
Therefore, no one found it worth the risk to point out that she couldn't write or speak. I expect she graduated and got her Master's Degree one day, and perhaps went on to get a Doctorate.
What she didn't do was learn how to write and communicate her ideas. Having read several of her pieces, I have only a vague idea that she was interested in a unique black culture that existed on the sea islands of Georgia (the Gullahs).
Someday she finished school, and needed to find work. At that point, a lot of doors were closed to her that should have been open. Had she used her years in school to learn these skills, she could have gone very far indeed -- the academic world would love nothing more than to find a smart black woman to hire.
That "protection" served her very poorly, I suspect. I'm sure others must have felt similarly, but the rules and institutions set up to combat racism are quite powerful. The threat of them meant it wasn't worth the risk for anyone to try to correct her.
Posted by: Grim at March 14, 2007 08:51 AM
Where are the Child Protective Service agencies in these cities? (No doubt harrassing some parent who actually dared spank their kid, but that's another rant.)
Adults(!) can choose to endanger their hearing in these joints, but children don't know any better, and. apparently, neither do their parents. Every dance club I've ever been in has multiple spots where hearing damage is not just possible, but certain, and, in many of them, there's no place in the club which has below damaging levels of sound.
Posted by: bud at March 14, 2007 11:06 AM
"...one has to wonder: just who is in charge here? Where have all the adults gone?"
Silly, silly Cassandranitanova. You answered that question a long time ago.
On second thought, perhaps this was prescience working for you. Say, you wouldn't by any chance have any random numbers floating around in your head just begging for attention, would you? Say, about seven of them?
jus' axin'
Posted by: Sly2017 at March 14, 2007 11:51 AM
The problems with proper use of English start at a young age. It doesn't take much, as an adult, to gently correct poor grammar. I've done it often during my student teaching last semester and while subbing this semester. And I do it regardless of the race of the child. Just take what they said, convert it to proper English, and repeat it back to the child, then have the child repeat the proper statement back to you. Same thing if you are assisting with/grading written work - point out the errors they've made and how to make it better.
Grim - the woman you mention was failed throughout her academic career, and it's now going to cost her...
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at March 14, 2007 04:47 PM
Do people not understand and honor love and commitment anymore? If I only knew who to blame for this.
Posted by: J-Lo's Butt at March 15, 2007 01:59 PM
Outthaway, ho!
You're blocking the cameras!
Posted by: Britney's.. Oh Nevermind at March 15, 2007 02:13 PM